Farmer Perspectives on Agriculture and Weather Variability in the Corn Belt: A Statistical Atlas

 

The effectiveness of any adaptation or mitigation action in Corn Belt agriculture depends on the degree to which the region’s farmers are willing and able to act. At the outset of this project, little was known about farmers’ perspectives on these critical topics. A primary objective of this project is to conduct social science research that assesses farmer understanding of climate change and attitudes toward adaptive and mitigative practices and strategies. Toward that end, a survey of 5000 farmers from 22 watersheds in 11 Corn Belt states was conducted in February 2012. The survey was conducted in partnership with the Useful to Usable (U2U) project (www.AgClimate4U.org), another USDA-funded climate and agriculture project.

The watersheds that were surveyed account for more than half of all US corn and soybean production. Farmers selected for the survey were those who grew corn and who had more than $100,000 in gross farm income in 2011; these larger-scale farmers cultivate approximately 80 percent of the farmland in the region.

The farmer survey data have been compiled in a “statistical atlas” that contains tables that present the data and maps that show the geographical distribution of survey results across the Corn Belt. Data presented include:

  • Beliefs about climate change
  • Attitudes toward potential climate change adaptation and mitigation actions
  • Concerns about climate-related threats to farm operations
  • Perceived capacity to deal with the predicted impacts of climate change
  • Recent experience with extreme weather events

Weather maps that were developed using data from National Weather Service Cooperative Observer weather stations from across the region are also presented. The maps show differences over time in extreme precipitation, drought, and heat stress by watershed. 

We intend the maps and tables to be resources that extension educators, agricultural advisors, and other agricultural stakeholders across the region can use to help them understand farmer perspectives in their local areas.

Study OVERVIEW.

Statistical Atlas Briefs

These short reports summarize key results from the Statistical Atlas:
 
Farmer attitudes toward farm-level adaptation to increased weather variability
Corn Belt Farmers' attitudes toward institutional support for adaptation to increased weather variability
Corn Belt farmers' attitudes toward actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Corn Belt farmers' beliefs about climate change and its causes
Corn Belt farmers' concerns about water-realted threats to farm viability
Corn Belt farmers' concerns about drought- and heat-related threats to their farm operations
Corn Belt farmers' concerns about pest and disease threats to their farm operations

Full Statistical Atlas Volume 1 Report

It is recommended that you download/save these chapters before opening. Depending on your internet connection speed, it may take a few seconds or a few minutes to download/save each chapter. Note: This report contains some blank pages.
 
Cover Page and Table of Contents
Chapter 1, Study Overview
Chapter 2, Attitudes Toward Adaptive and Mitigative Action
Chapter 3, Beliefs about Climate Change
Chapter 4, Perceived Risk and Experienced Hazard
Chapter 5, Influence of Agricultural Actors
Chapter 6, Capacity
Chapter 7, Farm and Farmer Characteristics
Chapter 8, Weather
Chapter 9, Marginal Soils
Appendix and References
 
Download the entire study
NOTE: Due to the file's large size, it is recommended that you download/save this report before attempting to open it.

 

 

farmer survey photo

 

Sustainable Corn BLOG

Farmers and scientists in the Corn Belt discussing cover crops, weather, tillage, drainage water managment and much more.

 

Sustainable Corn YouTube Channel

SUSTAINABLECORN.ORG | Website Administrator
This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2011-68002-30190
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed on this website are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.